November, 1967 |
My first day in front of a room filled with
kids scared the hell out of me, but I kept my confident veneer. As a first year
teacher, I was assigned 5 classes – 3 Algebra 1 and and 2 General Math. When I
asked for advice about teaching the general math classes I was told to give
them busy work. The textbook we used was at least 10 years old, and there
wasn’t much in it that my students could relate to. Sometimes I pretended to be
doing something important at my desk so I would let them chat away the “study”
period that I had given them.
Fortuntely, it never came back to haunt me, although I did feel guilty
about it. What was the matter with me? I wasn’t sure which was more boring - teaching them or watching them learn. A
couple of them reminded me of the girls who used to sit in the back of the room
with the sweathogs in the Welcome Back, Kotter TV show. Why was I so irresponsible? Because I
really didn’t know what to do with them. So I chickened out and hid behind busy work pretending it was
important.
The Algebra classes, on the other hand, were
fun for me. The students were motivated. About 35 years later I heard from a
couple of them thanking me for making it interesting for them. (Thank you,
Internet.) I appreciated it. Better
late than never. I still plan to
visit one of the students in California. OMG, he’s in his 50s.
The
Stock Market Game
So three/fifths of my day was fine, but the other
two/fifths of general math classes was boring for both my students and me. I really didn’t know it, but we had an
unspoken compromise, a kind of truce where we agreed that if they didn’t act
out and looked busy, I wouldn’t bother them or try to make them think. They had
collectively given up on math long before they even got to me. I knew I wouldn’t be able to do this
forever. I could stand it for just so long. Something had to give.
Then I got a break. On one of my caffeine
energized mornings in the spring of 1968, I read about how the stock market was doing well, gaining
momentum. It seemed that any stocks
in those early 60s carrying the name “tronics” became “highflyers.” The electronics sector was responsible
for a 2 year bull market after President Johnson’s state of the Union address on
January 10, 1967. Despite my math
background the electronics field was virgin territory for me, as was the stock
market It wouldn’t be until 1970
that I’d spend $70 on my first
Bowmar “brain” calculator. I was
intrigued by how the mainframe (whatever that was) seemed to be rocket
propelling the stock market.
I was still thinking about the stock market
when I discovered a Stock Market game in a department store. I thought it would
interesting to try it with my general math classes. At this point, I had no
real hope for anything. Nothing to lose.
I just wanted another way to get through the day.
Okay – despite how this sounds – like something
scripted in a movie – It really did happen. I bought the board game and we played it. It was a
hit! Even the principal stopped by
my room to see what all the ruckus was about. He just stood there dumbfounded
not sure what to make of it. The sweathogs were having fun doing something
educational. Kids engaged in
buying and selling stocks. Now, fast forward 50 years and I’m playing the same
game with a group of distracted 6th graders. But I’m getting ahead
of myself. I’ll return to Stocks and Bonds in a later chapter.
We had fun and my students were doing math
willingly because they wanted to not only win the game but doing math made
sense to them. I had stumbled upon something so pedagogically important that I would never forget it: sustained willing engagement.*
* This is an excerpt from my book The Wannado Curriculum A Math Teacher's Journey to the Dynamic Math 2.0 Classroom available from Amazon.
No comments:
Post a Comment